Andrew Traub

Texas Supreme Court – No More Free Bites

Last Friday, the Texas Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Texas’ “first free bite” rule (allowing a dog owner to escape most legal liability if a previously gentle dog attacks) does not free owners of the responsibility of stopping an attack once it occurs.

The so-called first-free-bite rule penalizes an owner who knows their pet is dangerous, but limits legal liability for those who reasonably believe their dog poses no risk to others.

In its ruling, the court stated that a pet owner “owes a duty to stop the dog from attacking a person after the attack has begun.”Knowledge of a dog’s nature, whether violent or not, plays no role on this basic duty.

In reversing two lower courts, the court ruled that Genevia Bushnell, who received wounds on her legs, arms, and back in 2001 that took more than two years to heal, could sue Janet Mott, the owner of the three dogs that attacked her.

According to Bushnell, Mott watched the attack from several feet away but did nothing to help and even scolded Bushnell’s son for trying to calm the dogs so he could rescue his mother.

Mouth-to-Mouth step in CPR isn't always needed

Client Reviews and Ratings

T K.
Andrew is very professional and succeeding in getting a very satisfactory settlement in my very difficult case. He was diligent and maintained a high level...Read OnYelp Reviews

T K.

Request a Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation or call us at (512) 246-9191.

Your Information

While most of our clients hail from Austin, Round Rock, Cedar Park, Georgetown, and Pflugerville in Travis and Williamson Counties, we have also worked with clients in Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio. Other clients have come from Lakeway, Jollyville, Anderson Mill, Kyle, and Leander. If your accident was in Texas, we can help you. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.